I would like to begin this post of mine with a small extract:
"The Indian Constitution, while not mentioning the word "press", provides for "the right to freedom of speech and expression"
Indian Media and Press has always been successful in showing the inner story of any happening in India or Abroad, but with a little add on "masala" to it. But the questions which arose in my mind is that "Is it a good idea to provide Indian Press with this liberty and freedom?". The Media is responsible for showing all the illegal activities happening in India through its various means(Sting Operations) but also has contributed in showcasing the lives of various people(In Extreme Details..!), which is not correct. If Media is granted freedom of speech then the Citizens of India are also provided with some basic rights which Indian Media is intervening in.
The Media People are treating themselves as the "Bonds" of the century as they think they have got the means and the right to ruin or build the life of anyone. Since most of the Indian Public is Dumb Enough to completely believe the things which are shown by the media.But is there a need for censorship?....Instead of Complete Censorship, the news which is printed or shown on T.V should be verified and then be allowed to be distributed.
No comments:
Post a Comment